While reading the first half of
Tariq Ali’s novel Shadows of the
Pomegranate Tree, I found myself repeatedly thinking about the unique
narrative voice Ali presents throughout the text. Because Ali uses an
omniscient voice within the narration of the text, we as readers are not
limited to learning only one character’s thoughts or viewpoint on the Catholic
Church’s growing dominance over Al-Andalus. In fact, after reading the
Prologue, I thought the majority of the text would follow the character of
Ximenes de Cisneros and his bloodthirsty means of converting Muslims into
Catholics. Instead, Ali presents a virtual revolving door of protagonists and
perspectives. From Ximenes de Cisneros, Ali transitions into the voices of
nine-year-old Yazid, twenty-two year old Zuhayr, and their father Umar.
Ali’s third-person omniscient
narration of the text allows readers to get so close into the heads and
thoughts of his characters that he actually transitions into the first person
on occasion. For example, when Umar envisions talking to his Uncle Miguel while
in the courtyard of his palace, Ali transitions into the first person to
reflect the growing passion and desperation Umar feels when speaking of Islamic
persecution. Ali writes: “The fault is also in ourselves, but how can I even
think about that now? All I see is that wall of fire and behind it the gloating
face of that vulture [Ximenes], celebrating his triumph” (20). Rather than the usual
third-person narrative I am used to reading, which follows the emotions and
thoughts of one protagonist while remaining emotionally detached from all other
characters, Ali manages to portray the mindsets of each of his characters while
still writing in the third person for the majority of the novel.
One notable
absence I discovered while reading the first half of the novel, however, was
the lack of female narration. There are plenty of female characters within the
book—from the wet-nurse Ama, to sisters Hind and Kulthum, to their mother
Zubayda and Great-Aunt Zhara—who certainly don’t lack in adventures or
experiences which could add to the overall plot of the novel. Hind is portrayed
as a rebellious tomboy from the moment she is introduced in the novel, riding
back into town on horseback with her father while her injured brother journeys
in a wagon with the women. I can't help but wonder how different the novel could be if the character of Hind was more active in the development of the novel's plot--how does a teenage girl's perspective on growing Christian dominance in a former Islamic stronghold differ from that of her brothers' or father's perspectives? In addition, when the story of Zhara’s tumultuous childhood
and failed romances is told, it is by Umar or the old man who lives in the
cave. As of yet, Zhara has no voice in telling her own story—instead, the responsibility
falls to either her nephew or former lover.
In reading
the second half of the novel I will be interested in seeing if any of Ali’s
female characters gain the chance to narrate their own stories, or if we will
continue to follow the story of Catholicism’s growing stronghold in Al-Andalus through the perspectives of male characters like Umar, Zuhayr, and Yazid.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.