Amin Maalouf’s Leo Africanus
Week 1 – March 5,
2013
Ellen Walpole
The
Idea of Identity
As we talked about in class today,
the preface of the novel is used as a tool for foreshadowing the identity of
the main character, Hasan. However, I think the larger theme that can also be
seen in the preface is the fact that the author, Amin Maalouf, also fails to
have a one specific identity; there is no one category that he can be put
under. As was seen in the videos, Maalouf was born in Lebanon but can speak French
and Arabic fluently and is also considered a European. Instead of finding this strange,
I think it is amazing to have so many different cultural backgrounds.
Maalouf said he feels European when
there are problems in Europe, and Lebanese when there are issues in Lebanon,
and when I heard that it took me awhile to actually process that he can feel
like he belongs to both places. I am assuming he surpasses ideas of Orientalism
because he is able to completely relate to so many different cultures. The
discourse that we often find ourselves would be much easier for him to avoid.
While Leo Africanus did actually
exist, I believe that Maalouf’s portrayal of him was written from some personal
experiences. The real man Africanus was also a writer and traveled extensively,
much like the fictional writer Maalouf. To “come from no country, from no city,
no tribe” (Maalouf 1) establishes a lot of gray area about where Hasan should
feel allegiance to.
The
idea of global citizenship or a “world citizen,” also discussed in class, is interesting
in that while it would be ideal to feel like you belonged to so many places,
where would you establish your “home?” Which in turn raises the question on
what the idea of “home” really is; is a country your home? Or the town you grew
up in? I don’t believe that “home” can be an address and the way Maalouf wrote
that Hasan was “…the son of the road, [his] country is the caravan, [his] life
the most unexpected of voyages” (Maalouf 1), and that “[he] belong[s] only to
God and to the earth, and it is to them that [he] will one day soon return”
(Maalouf 1).
Clearly this leads the reader to
believe that it doesn’t matter where you are from or where you call home, it is
only your relationship with God that truly matters. I do find this somewhat
ironic, though, because Maalouf’s religion is not clear; but, I suppose it is
written from Hasan’s point of view.
It is perplexing how convoluted the different types and forms of people that exist today are. A "world citizen" is usually thought of as someone who has traveled or exposed themselves to a variety of different countries and cultures. As you stated, it seems far easier to avoid this; in the United States, in particular. Maalouf is trying to belittle the importance of labels in identifying and interpreting who people are. It's impossible to define a person by a single identity or label, or by a group they belong to. There are too many experiences and influences involved to ever fully grasp the depth of an individual. This is why Maalouf portrays Hasan so well, because he is not a one dimentional character with predictable traits.
ReplyDelete