Leo Africanus is
a novel filled with many different characters, almost all of which, even the
quite minor ones, are fully developed and fleshed out as individuals. Despite
the fact that the characters seem consistently well-defined and articulated,
the status of women characters in the story is very problematic. Female
characters are prominent in the story and are given lots of background and
detail and in their development as characters. Salma, for example, is given a
whole chapter to explain her experience on the day of the Parade and the great
flood that caused so much devastation. Her tense relationship with Warda, and
the worries the two women had about their pregnancies, are also given a lot of
attention in the text. The feelings of these women, and other women like Gaudy
Sarah and Miriam, as well as the hardships of their situations are explained in
this novel and seem to be considered important.
But
the treatment of women becomes problematic when we consider how and why the
narrator, Hasan, is including these descriptions of women in the stories he is
passing down to his own son. It often seems that he (Hasan) only includes these
narratives about women in order to better explain the relationships between
himself and other males in the story: relationships that seem to be more
important to him than those with females. The best example of this is the whole
scene with the proposed marriage of Miriam to the Zarwali. Hasan hears the
horrific rumors about how the Zarwali treats his wives, and does seem to be
genuinely concerned about the well-being of his sister. This concern, however,
is qualified by some of his underlying concerns: “I needed someone around me to
show indignation, someone who would tell me that the world had not been created
so that women and the joys of life should be handed over to the Zarwali and
people like him,” (135). This passage suggests that, though his concern for his
sister may be genuine, it is also infused with a sense of masculine justice
that the Zarwali doesn’t deserve to be handed this woman (implying that some
men do).
The
use of women characters in the novel is further complicated by Hasan’s
expressions in the aftermath of Miriam’s being taken to the leper colony. He
says of his relationship with his father: “Miriam’s engagement had torn us
apart; her ordeal hastened our reconciliation,” (148). This statement implies
that Miriam’s horrific ordeals have simply been a vehicle to the more important
male relationship between father and son, therefore minimizing the truly
terrible things that Miriam has faced.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.