To comment further on Hasan's surroundings, I found it interesting how many other issues the Jews and Muslims faced. Disease, for example, was described on page 91 in my text: "At first, those who were afflicted by it were isolated in special houses...The whole town became an enormous infected area, and no medicine proved effective against it." Who is to blame for this? As Maalouf discussed in the Youtube video, all cultures have different views on other cultures/countries. In this case, all countries infected began to blame other countries for disease. We get a real sense of the spaces the exiled were confined to. Not only were they struggling to survive religious persecution, they were also trying to survive disease.
Still, Hasan loved his new city. He was able to see a new beginning for himself and his family in Fez. Social class seemed to be erased, and Hasan was able to appreciate the city for its beauty aside from the political business surrounding it. "All around them, hanging up and stretched out, was the washin of the rich and the poor billowing in the breeze, like the salt of the same boat" (p84). This beautify imagery ties the oppressed religions together in a way that is soothing to Hasan. While they are exiled, they are all experiencing the same uprooting.
Going off your first point, I think one of the key successes of the book is its ability to give voice to many different characters without taking the focus away from Hasan. The first few years necessarily need their voice since he was a baby and theri wouldn't be much of a story, but it really gets interesting once he starts growing up. We have Hasans's account juxtaposed with his family's words and the community's words and it's almost a seamless transition between the tree. Not that the book is so post-modern that you can't tell who is talking, but it is important to note that this feature seems to be intentional nevertheless.I think part of the reason we are able to read about all of these issues and see the connections between them isn't just because of how Maalouf describes them but how he puts the differing accounts in such close proximity to one another. Orientalist or not, this historiography tends towards a more community based experience rather than just the individual.
ReplyDelete