In
the first half of Ohran Pamuk’s The White
Castle, Hoja exhibits great curiosity about science, literature, and the
world around him. His quest for knowledge
seems to stem from the need to create a unified reality. Every object has its place, from the stars in
the sky to the gears in his oversized clock.
He is obsessed with making models and questioning their accuracy. The narrator, on the other hand, is a vision
of disunity. He is both physically
displaced and mentally incoherent, openly mixing memory with imagination. Hoja’s quest for universal harmony juxtaposed
with the narrator’s frustratingly disjointed identity has interesting
implications about the perceived dichotomy between the East and the West.
The same gap between perception and
reality that leads to the narrator’s muddled identity and Hoja’s desire for
unity is also responsible for more general stereotypes about “the East” and
“the West.” Hoja demands that the
narrator teach him all he knows from his education in Venice. Not only does he legally own the narrator, he
claims the sum of his intellect as well.
The narrator feels underappreciated by his Turkish doppelganger to whom
he was forced to surrender much of his individual identity. Once the narrator’s knowledge and
understanding of the world becomes Hoja’s, the master uses it to develop new
theories and ideas beyond the narrator’s comprehension. So, when Hoja took the narrator’s identity,
he fit it into the existing structure of his previous worldview and thereby made
it his own. Although Hoja is an
“Eastern” character, the way he alters his slave’s identity by trying to place
it within his own subjectively designed universe is suggestive of orientalism.
While Hoja fills the gaps in his models
with science and factual information, the narrator covers the holes in his
identity with imagination. The reader
knows, through both the preface and the confession of the narrator himself,
that the story being told is only semi-true even in the fictional world. While
some events are confirmed, others are potentially or admittedly conjured for the
sake of fluidity. The story’s various
metafictional layers amplify this factual uncertainty. For the English-speaking audience, The White Castle is the real translation
of a fictional translation of a semi-fictional manuscript. Even the dedication immediately following the
copyright is made up. All parties, from
the real translator to the fictional translator to the narrator, have digested
and therefore changed the story before it reaches the mind of the reader, where
it is altered once again to fit within the reader’s own worldview. Therefore, the orientalist tendency to fill
confusion and misunderstanding with fiction is exemplified through the uniquely
structured narration and the narrator himself.
The meeting of Hoja and the narrator is representative of a meeting
between East and West in which individual perceptions are impressed upon and
consequently change the “other.”
I agree that Hoja appears to have stolen the Venetian's identity. In his desire to learn all the knowledge that belongs to his slave, he is bringing together the cultures of both east and west together. However, Hoja displays his distrust for the Venetian in his sporadic mood swings. He wants to learn from the Venetian, but yet they both remain in the master- slave relationship. If the Venetian is honest with Hoja and tells him what he needs to do, then Hoja threatens him with punishment and anger. Therefore I do not believe that Hoja isn't as big of a believer in unification as the author of this blog post believes he is. While the narrator may be scattered and unreliable, Hoja constantly reinforces that he holds the power in their relationship. In this circumstance I believe that Hoja reflects orientalist beliefs. In both stealing the Venetian's identity and subjecting him to enslavement, Hoja exemplifies orientalist stereotypes.
ReplyDelete